The influence of clinical experience and gender in the manual application of torque on screws of implant-supported prosthesis

Autores

  • Ebele Adaobi Silva
  • Cecília Alves de Sousa
  • Maria Cristina Rosifini Alves Rezende
  • Paulo Henrique dos Santos
  • Wirley Gonçalves Assunção

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v7i1.2287

Resumo

Compare with the torque value recommended by the manufacturer, the values of maximum closing torques generated by volunteers of the male and female gender, with and without experience in implant-prosthesis, for tightening the screw UCLA abutment retention. The hypotheses tested were that the greatest experience in the field would not influence the value of the applied torque, as there would be no difference between volunteers from different genders. In this way, 266 volunteers were classified according to their expertise in pre-clinical (PC), clinical (C) and professional (P). Were placed seated, simulating normal forward work position in front a digital torque meter. A specimen composed of an external hex implant embedded in modified polyester resin, a metal crown and its retaining screw was attached on torque meter. The participants were provided with directions to tighten the abutment retaining screw by using a manual torque driver and apply full force in one movement of rotation. The professional group achieved the highest mean manual torque (15.80 N / cm); males (14.96 N/cm) scores a higher than females (02.11 N/cm). They could not reach the torque value recommended by the manufacturer. Thus, the factors that influence the manual application of torque include the level of clinical experience and the physical strength of the operator. The conclusion is that the use of a calibrated mechanical driver torque is essential to apply a suitable and controlled torque value and capable of promoting a proper preload and maintaining the screwed joint for long periods.

Descriptors: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Stress, Mechanical.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Sahin C, Ayyildiz S. Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6(1):35-8.

Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH, Polizzi G et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9(1):49-54.

Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent. 1993; 21(4):203-8.

Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9(1):90-4.

Kim ES, Shin SY. Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5(1):21-8.

Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992; 7(3):353-9.

Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(1):24-32.

Drago CJ. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18(2):273-8.

Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M. A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surgery; 2005; 43(1):7-12.

Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol. 2002; 28(2):67-73.

Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11(Suppl 1):156-8.

Satterthwaite J, Rickman L. Retrieval of a fractured abutment screw thread from an implant: a case report. Br Dent J. 2008; 204(4):177-80.

McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 1998; 42(1):71-89.

Michalakis K, Calvani PL, Muftu S, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H. The effect of different implant-abutment connections on screw joint stability. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40(2):146-52.

Cho SC, Small PN, Elian N, Tarnow D. Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data. Implant Dent. 2004; 13(3):245-50.

Kano SC, Binon P, Bonfante G, Curtis DA. Effect of casting procedures on screw loosening in UCLA-type abutments. J Prosthodont. 2006; 15(2):77-81.

Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent. 1994; 3(1):17-21.

Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10(3):295-302.

Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68(6):949-56.

Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barao VA, Assunção WG. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(2):251-6.

Goheen KL, Vermilyea SG, Vossoughi J, Agar JR. Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 9(2):149-55.

Gross M, Kozak D, Laufer BZ, Weiss EI. Manual closing torque in five implant abutment systems: an in vitro comparative study. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(5):574-8.

Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(Suppl 3):97-113.

Wittneben JG, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and failure rates with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and single crowns: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16(3):356-64.

Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(5):537-52.

Worthington P, Bolender CL, Taylor TD. The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987; 2(2):77-84.

Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64(2):185-94.

Assunção WG, Barao VA, Delben JA, Gomes EA, Garcia IR Jr. Effect of unilateral misfit on preload of retention screws of implant-supported prostheses submitted to mechanical cycling. J Prosthodont Res. 2011; 55(1):12-8.

Assunção WG, dos Santos PH, Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barão VA, Tabata LF. Effect of misfit on preload maintenance of retention screws of implant-supported prostheses. J Mater Eng Perform. 2009; 18(7):935-8.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-02-10

Como Citar

Silva, E. A., Sousa, C. A. de, Alves Rezende, M. C. R., Santos, P. H. dos, & Assunção, W. G. (2018). The influence of clinical experience and gender in the manual application of torque on screws of implant-supported prosthesis. ARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v7i1.2287

Edição

Seção

Artigos