Toma de decisiones en el uso de sistemas de fijación absorbibles en cirugías maxilofaciales: revisión sistemática

Autores/as

  • Nilton Freitas Medrado Filho Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, UERN, 59300-000 Caicó - RN, Brasil
  • César Antonio Araújo Melo Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, UERN, 59300-000 Caicó - RN, Brasil
  • Gilda Araújo Azevedo Cunha Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, UERN, 59300-000 Caicó - RN, Brasil
  • Yasmin Rebeca Santos Nascimento Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, UERN, 59300-000 Caicó - RN, Brasil
  • Georgia Costa de Araújo Souza Departamento de Odontologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, UERN, 59300-000 Caicó - RN, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i7.5356

Palabras clave:

Placas Óseas, Dispositivos de Fijación Quirúrgicos, Implantes Absorbibles

Resumen

Introducción: Las fracturas de los huesos faciales son muy frecuentes en las lesiones faciales, especialmente las fracturas mandibulares. Para poder tratarlos es necesario disponer de un sistema de fijación con el fin de restaurar el hueso fracturado, su forma y función. Objetivo: Identificar los factores que influyen en el uso de sistemas de fijación absorbible en cirugía oral maxilofacial. Material y método: Se trata de una revisión sistemática realizada en las bases de datos MEDLINE, BBO y SciELO, de agosto de 2019 a septiembre de 2020 en los portales de PubMed y VHL. Entre los 322 hallazgos y luego de utilizar filtros, leer títulos y resúmenes, se incluyeron 30 artículos para componer la revisión. Resultados: Los hallazgos del estudio revelan que existen una serie de factores que influyen en la elección del mejor material, tales como: su aplicación en pacientes pediátricos o adultos, la palpabilidad de las placas, la resistencia, las principales medidas de satisfacción, la implicación con enfermedades malignas, complicaciones y las principales novedades que ha venido discutiendo la literatura sobre el tipo de material. Conclusión: Se recomienda el uso de placas absorbibles para uso pediátrico, ya que minimizan las restricciones de crecimiento, prescinden de la necesidad de cirugía secundaria, reduciendo así los gastos hospitalarios. Además, las placas biodegradables dan como resultado pruebas de imagen con menos artefactos, de modo que no comprometen el diagnóstico em pacientes con neoplasias.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Laughlin RM, Block MS, Wilk R, Malloy RB, Kent JN. Resorbable plates for the fixation of mandibular fractures: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(1):89-96.

Paes JV, de Sá Paes FL, Valiati R, de Oliveira MG, Pagnoncelli RM. Retrospective study of prevalence of face fractures in southern Brazil. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(1):80-6.

Wu CM, Chen YA, Liao HT, Chen CH, Pan CH, Chen CT. Surgical treatment of isolated zygomatic fracture: Outcome comparison between titanium plate and bioabsorbable plate. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(4):370-376.

Baravarian B, Lindner TP, Merchav-Feuermann R. Advancements in Bone Fixation Utilizing Novel Biointegrative Fixation Technology. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2018;35(1):53-62.

Sukegawa S, Kanno T, Nagano D, Shibata A, Sukegawa-Takahashi Y, Furuki Y. The Clinical Feasibility of Newly Developed Thin Flat-Type Bioresorbable Osteosynthesis Devices for the Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Fractures: Is There a Difference in Healing Between Bioresorbable Materials and Titanium Osteosynthesis? J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(8):2124-129.

Rha EY, Paik H, Byeon JH. Bioabsorbable plates and screws fixation in mandible fractures: clinical retrospective research during a 10-year period. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(4):432-36.

Yang RT, Lv K, Zhou HH, Li Z, Li ZB. Resorbable plates for the fixation of isolated mandibular angle fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(2):447-48.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

Burlini D, Conti G, Amadori F, Bardellini E, De Giuli C. Management of paediatric maxillofacial fractures: conventional methods and resorbable materials. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):24-8.

Omezli MM, Torul D, Polat ME, Dayi E. Biomechanical comparison of osteosynthesis with poly-L-lactic acid and titanium screw in intracapsular condylar fracture fixation: An experimental study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(5):589-93.

An J, Jia P, Zhang Y, Gong X, Han X, He Y. Application of biodegradable plates for treating pediatric mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(4):515-20.

Kim NK, Nam W, Kim HJ. Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(3):223-29.

Sakamoto Y, Minabe T, Kato T, Kishi K. Assessment of the RIVET fixation system for cranioplasty using the pull-out technique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(2):281-84.

Oh JS, Kim SG. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(2):186-91.

Konofaos P, Goubran S, Wallace RD. The Role of Resorbable Mesh as a Fixation Device in Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(1):105-8.

Mahmoud SM, Liao HT, Chen CT. Aesthetic and Functional Outcome of Zygomatic Fractures Fixation Comparison With Resorbable Versus Titanium Plates. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76 Suppl 1:S85-90.

Leno MB, Liu SY, Chen CT, Liao HT. Comparison of functional outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction between titanium and absorbable plates and screws for fixation of mandibular fractures: A one-year prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(5):704-9.

Essig H, Lindhorst D, Gander T, Schumann P, Könü D, Altermatt S, Rücker M. Patient-specific biodegradable implant in pediatric craniofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(2):216-22.

Nguyen DC, Woo AS, Farber SJ, Skolnick GB, Yu J, Naidoo SD, Patel KB. Comparison of Resorbable Plating Systems: Complications During Degradation. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(1):88-92.

Son JH, Ha J, Cho YC, Sung IY. Are Biodegradable Plates Applicable in Endoscope-Assisted Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Subcondyle Fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(8):1706-1715.

Chu SG, Lee JS, Lee JW, Yang JD, Chung HY, Cho BC, Choi KY. Comparisons among four types of absorbable plates used for internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(3):383-88.

Na WG, Lim H, Koh SH. Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of Stability Following Two- and Three-Point Fixation With Biodegradable Plates Among Patients With Zygomatic Fracture. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(2):478-82.

Song IS, Choi J, Kim SR, Lee JH. Stability of bioresorbable plates following reduction of mandibular body fracture: Three-dimensional analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(11):1752-757.

Cural Ü, Atalay B, Yildirim MS. Comparison of Mechanical Stabilization of the Mandibular Angulus Fracture Fixation, With Titanium Plates and Screws, Resorbable Plates and Screws, and Bone Adhesives. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1780-787.

Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Hotta A, Tsutsui T, Fukaya K, Hiraide R, Takayama A, Tsunoda T, Saito Y, Baba N, Sato M. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(11):1788-793.

Janickova M, Statelova D, Mikuskova K, Jesenak M, Malachovsky I. Biodegradable versus titanium plates and screws for paediatric facial skeleton fractures. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(9):554-59.

Kim DY, Sung IY, Cho YC, Park EJ, Son JH. Bioabsorbable plates versus metal miniplate systems for use in endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(3):413-17.

Filinte GT, Akan IM, Çardak GNA, Mutlu ÖÖ. Pediatrik mandibula kırıklarındaki ikilem: Eriyen plaklar mı yoksa metal plaklar mı? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015; 21(6): 509-13.

Sukegawa S, Kanno T, Matsumoto K, Sukegawa-Takahashi Y, Masui M, Furuki Y. Complications of a poly-L-lactic acid and polyglycolic acid osteosynthesis device for internal fixation in maxillofacial surgery. Odontology. 2018;106(4):360-68.

Yan G, Chuo W, Zhang R, Zhou Q, Yang M. Evaluation of the Effect of Bioresorbable Plates and Screws in the Treatment of Condylar Fractures, Assisted by Digital Preoperative Planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;77(7):1434.e1-1434.e16.

Murakami K, Yamamoto K, Sugiura T, Horita S, Matsusue Y, Kirita T. Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analyses of Various Types of Plates Placed for a Virtually Reduced Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible of a Patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(6):1239.e1-1239.e11.

Branch LG, Crantford C, Cunningham T, Bharti G, Thompson J, Couture D, David LR. Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Cranial Reconstruction Using Resorbable Plating Systems for the Treatment of Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(1):26-9.

Yasonov SA, Lopatin AV, Bel'chenko VA, Vasil'ev IG. Biodegradiruemye sistemy fiksatsii v detskoĭ cherepno-litsevoĭ khirurgii: 10-letniĭ opyt ispol'zovaniia u 324 patsientov [Biodegradable fixation systems in pediatric craniofacial surgery: 10-year experience with 324 patients]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2017;81(6):48-55.

Yan G, Zhang R, Chuo W, Gao X, Zhou Q, Yang M. Open Reduction Effects of Digitally Treating Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures With Bio-Resorbable Materials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;78(6):986-95.

Mukherjee CG, Mukherjee U. Maxillofacial trauma in children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5(3):231-36.

Sim FW. Re: Kim NK, Nam W, Kim HJ. Comparison of miniplates and biodegradable plates in reconstruction of the mandible with a fibular free flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(7):675.

Publicado

2021-07-16

Cómo citar

Medrado Filho, N. F. ., Melo, C. A. A., Cunha, G. A. A. ., Nascimento, Y. R. S. ., & Souza, G. C. de A. . (2021). Toma de decisiones en el uso de sistemas de fijación absorbibles en cirugías maxilofaciales: revisión sistemática. ARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION, 10(7), 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i7.5356

Número

Sección

Original Articles