Conservative treatment in oral rehabilitation through the interaction between Restorative Dentistry and Dental Prosthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i5.4991Keywords:
Dental Prosthesis, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Mouth RehabilitationAbstract
This study aimed to present, through a case report, the interaction between restorative dentistry and dental prosthesis, guiding the clinician an option of minimally invasive clinical conduct in the treatment of oral rehabilitation. Male patient, 49 years old, with main complaint of mobility in the upper anterior teeth that supported a fixed prosthesis and aesthetic dissatisfaction of the smile. The clinical examination was carried out and a periodontal condition of all upper teeth was found, periodontitis with grade 2 mobility and severe vertical bone resorption in teeth 31, 32, 37 and 42, absence of elements 36 and 41 and grade 2 mobility in the teeth. other lower teeth due to malocclusion. Dental extraction of the upper teeth was planned, followed by a bilateral sinus lift and the installation of six implants for the prosthesis of the Banemärk protocol type. In the lower arch, scaling and root planing, extraction of teeth 31, 32, 37 42, installation of implants in the regions of teeth 32, 36 and 42 and installation of implant-supported prosthesis. Considering the need to reestablish the occlusion, the compromised periodontal condition of the posterior lower teeth and the need for aesthetic improvements, it was decided to perform restorations in composite resin of the BulkFill® type through the modified stamp technique, reproducing the occlusal anatomy of the elements. Thus, we can conclude that the interaction of restorative dentistry and dental prosthesis can be an interesting alternative for cases in which there is a need for conservative rehabilitation treatment, aiming to obtain excellent results in oral rehabilitation.
Downloads
References
Attin T, Filli T, Imfeld C, Schmidlin PR. Composite vertical bite reconstructions in eroded dentitions after 5•5 years: a case series. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(1):73-9.
Johansson A, Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(7):548-66.
Assaf C, Fahd JC, Sabbagh J. Four-Year Follow-up of Increased Vertical Dimension of Occlusion using Resin Composites. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018;8(5):469-74.
Dahl BL, Krogstad O. The effect of a partial bite raising splint on the occlusal face height. An x-ray cephalometric study in human adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 1982;40(1):17-24.
Reis A, Higashi C, Loguercio AD. Re-anatomization of anterior eroded teeth by stratification with direct composite resin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(5):304-16.
Dietschi D, Argente A. A comprehensive and conservative approach for the restoration of abrasion and erosion. part II: clinical procedures and case report. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6(2):142-59.
Kalaykova SI, Sterenborg BAMM, Loomans BAC, Huysmans MDNJM. Impact of restorative treatment of tooth wear upon masticatory performance. J Dent. 2019;88:103159.
Bartlett D, Sundaram G. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(6):613-17.
Güth JF, Almeida E Silva JS, Ramberger M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Treatment concept with CAD/CAM-fabricated high-density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(5):310-18.
Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Kreulen CM, Roeters JJ, Huysmans MC. Clinical performance of direct composite restorations for treatment of severe tooth wear. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(6):585-93
Johansson A, Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(7):548-66.
Opdam N, Skupien JA, Kreulen CM, Roeters J, Loomans B, Huysmans MD. Case Report: A Predictable Technique to Establish Occlusal Contact in Extensive Direct Composite Resin Restorations: The DSO-Technique. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S96-S108.
Vailati F, Vaglio G, Belser UC. Full-mouth minimally invasive adhesive rehabilitation to treat severe dental erosion: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(1):83-92.
Ramseyer ST, Helbling C, Lussi A. Posterior Vertical Bite Reconstructions of Erosively Worn Dentitions and the "Stamp Technique" - A Case Series with a Mean Observation Time of 40 Months. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(3):283-89.
Perrin P, Zimmerli B, Jacky D, Lussi A, Helbling C, Ramseyer S. Die Stempeltechnik für direkte Kompositversorgungen [The stamp technique for direct composite restoration]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(2):111-29.
Silva LD, de Lima VN, Faverani LP, de Mendonça MR, Okamoto R, Pellizzer EP. Maxillary sinus lift surgery-with or without graft material? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(12):1570-76.
Rizzo NSP, da Cunha LF, Sotelo BV, Gonzaga CC, Correr GM, Gaião U. Esthetic Rehabilitation with Direct Composite Resin in a Patient with Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A 2-Year Follow-Up. Case Rep Dent. 2019;2019:8407025.
Cogulu D, Becerik S, Emingil G, Hart PS, Hart TC. Oral rehabilitation of a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta. Pediatr Dent. 2009;31(7):523-27.
Reis B de O, Brogin FF, Catelan A, Briso ALF, Santos PH dos. Avaliação de diferentes procedimentos de acabamento e polimento sobre a rugosidade de superfície de resina composta submetida à escovação com dentifrício. Arch Health Invest. 2017 6(11):524-29
Sampaio CS, Pizarro PG, Atria PJ, Hirata R, Giannini M, Mahn E. Effect of Shortened Light-Curing Modes on Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent. 2020;45(5):496-505.
