Analysis of Color and Gloss Stability of Single-Increment Restorative Materials Exposed to Coloring and Acidic Beverage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v12i3.5993Keywords:
Glass Ionomer Cements, Acids, Composite ResinsAbstract
The insertion of single increments is an advantageous feature in terms of reducing clinical procedure time. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the color and gloss stability of single-increment restorative materials exposed to coloring and acidic beverage. Two types of composite resin were evaluated, one with incremental insertion (FT) and another with single increment (BK); as well as two high viscosity ionomeric cements, one without a protective coating (KT) and another with a protective coating with nanoparticulate filler (EQ). For each restorative material, 26 discs (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness) were made, totaling 104 specimens. The specimens were randomly divided into subgroups for the following immersions: artificial saliva and Coca-Cola. The change in color and brightness between the different types of materials was evaluated, before and after the proposed immersions. The data obtained for color change and brightness were submitted to the two-way analysis of variance test and the brightness was evaluated by the two-way analysis of variance repeated measures. For all analyses, the Tukey post-test was performed, with a significance level of 5%. Regarding the color results, the FT resin showed greater alteration than the BK in Coca-Cola, and the opposite occurred for saliva. As for ionomeric cements, KT obtained the greatest change in Coca-Cola. There was no statistical difference between the resins for brightness change, however, KT showed greater change when immersed in Coca-Cola than saliva. Thus, it can be concluded that the composite resin with a single insertion suffered less from the action of the coloring and acid drink in the color change; for the ionomeric cements KT showed greater chromatic and brightness change, when compared to EQ. Thus, the nanoparticulate coating provided additional protection to the hybrid restorative material.
Downloads
References
Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, Bitriol B, Dumitrescu N, Bauer P, Moritz A, Schedle. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta- analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):958-85.
Schwendicke F, Blunck U, Tu YK, Göstemeyer G. Does classification of composites for network meta-analyses lead to erroneous conclusions? Oper Dent. 2018;43(2):213-22.
Ong J, Yap Au, Hong JY, Eweis AH, Yahya NA. Viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives: a dynamic-mechanical analysis. Oper Dent. 2018;43(3):307-14.
El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(4):374-82.
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(8):993-1000.
Rosatto CM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1519-28.
Caixeta RV, Guiraldo RD, Kaneshima EN, Barbosa AS, Picolotto CP, Lima AE, Gonini Júnior A, Berger SB. Push-outbond strength of restorations with bulk-fill, flow, and conventional resin composites. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:452976.
Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;28:7(3).
Mickenautsch S. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements for direct posterior tooth restorations in permanent teeth: the evidence in brief. J Dent. 2016;55:121-23.
Grossi JA, Cabral RN, Ribeiro APD, Leal SC. Glass hybrid restorations as an alternative for restoring hypomineralized molars in the ART model. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18;18(1):65.
de Paula AB, de Fúcio SB, Alonso RC, Ambrosano GM, Puppin-Rontani RM. Influence of chemical degradation on the surface properties of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):E109-17.
Gezawi M El, Kaisarly D, Al-Saleh H, ArRejaie A, Al-Harbi F, Kunzelmann KH. Degradation potential of bulk versus incrementally applied and indirect composites: color, microhardness, and surface deterioration. Oper Dent. 2016;(41-6):e195-e208
Oliveira LC, Santos PH, Ramos FSS, Moda MD, Briso ALF, Fagundes TC. Wear, roughness and microhardness analyses of single increment restorative materials submitted to different challenges in vitro. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(2):247-55.
Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, et al. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1214-24.
Yap AU, Sim CP, Loh WL, Teo JH. Human-eye versus computerized colour matching. Oper Dent 1999;24:358-63.
Bahbishi N, Mzain W, Badeeb B, Nassar HM. Color stability and micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite materials after exposure to common beverages. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(3):787.
Mansouri SA, Zidan AZ. Effect of water sorption and solubility on color stability of bulk-fill resin composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(9):1129-34
Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Özarslan MM, Dündar A, Yilmaz B. Color of bulk-fill composite resin restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(2):E3-E8.
Ortengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behaviour of three composite resin materials. J Dent. 2001;29(1): 35-41.
Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, de Campos RA, Dos Santos PH, Machado LS, Fagundes TC. Repairability of aged resin composites mediated by different restorative systems. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2016;29(1):7-13.
Jassé FF, de Campos EA, Lefever D, et al. Influence of filler charge on gloss of composite materials before and after in vitro toothbrushing. J Dent. 2013;41(5):e41-e44.
Ayad NM. Susceptibility of restorative materials to staining by common beverages: an in vitro study. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007;2(2):236-47.
Vance M, Lawson NC, Rupal M, Beck P, Burgess JO. Color and gloss of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomers and resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27(5): 293-99.
Jafarpour D, Mese A, Ferooz M, Bagheri R. The effects of nanofilled resin-based coatings on the physical properties of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. J Dent. 2019;89:103177.
Mohan M, Aljohani Y, Rosivack RG. Effect of a wear-resistant resin coat on the color stability of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021; 39(3):262-266.
Savas S, Colgecen O, Yasa B, Kucukyilmaz E. Color stability, roughness, and water sorption/solubility of glass ionomer-Based restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):824-32.
Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk, T., Guler, E., & Kurt, S.. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(2):118–24.
Berber A, Cakir FY, Baseren M, Gurgan S. Effect of different polishing systems and drinks on the color stability of resin composite. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(4):662-67.
